Art. 10. Ciência da Informação Express adopts a peer review system, ensuring scientific rigor, impartiality, confidentiality, and editorial integrity, under the following modalities:
I – Double-blind review, in which the identities of authors and reviewers are mutually concealed, mandatorily applied to scientific articles, review articles, empirical studies, research reports, and teaching cases;
II – Single-blind review, in which the identity of the reviewers is preserved and the identity of the authors may be known, applied to the other sections of the journal, such as theoretical essays, interviews, scientific communications, reviews, press releases, and academic-oriented science communication texts.
Sole paragraph. The review modality adopted shall be defined according to the type of submission and indicated in the journal’s editorial workflow, in compliance with the principle of editorial transparency.
Art. 11. All manuscripts submitted to Ciência da Informação Express are initially subject to a preliminary editorial assessment aimed at verifying:
I – compliance with the journal’s scope;
II – originality and scientific relevance;
III – conformity with the author guidelines;
IV – observance of ethical principles and good editorial practices.
§ 1. Manuscripts falling under item I of Art. 10 shall be forwarded to at least two external reviewers under the double-blind review regime.
§ 2. Manuscripts falling under item II of Art. 10 shall be submitted to single-blind review, observing the same criteria of scientific rigor and editorial integrity.
§ 3. In the event of divergent reviews, the editorial team may appoint a third reviewer or arbitrate based on the manuscript and the reviews issued.
§ 4. Possible editorial decisions include:
I – acceptance;
II – acceptance with mandatory revisions;
III – submission to a new round of review;
IV – rejection.









